My opinion on this:
I have used cambam and vectric a similar amount (I’ve done about three different items in each).
Vectric is pretty ok. Definitely not worth $2000 in my opinion because it doesn’t have that many more features over other tools. The GUI may look a little newer than cambam, but it is about equally as convoluted. The simple 2D CAD tools are definitely better in vectric, but that isn’t saying much. Anyone who moves beyond rectangles and circles is going to be importing designs from another tool anyways. (I use inkscape to do pretty much all of my 2d cad and I’ve used sketchup for 3d design work) It might be a little bit easier for someone to get up and running simply due to the better polygon drawing tools. Once you move beyond that though it doesn’t really matter. The price is a huge factor for me, because I like doing a lot of design work at home and I don’t think anyone is going to be buying a $2k piece of software for home use. This means everyone is going to be stuck using it at the space on our CAD machine basically. And no, if the hive bought a license people would not be able to install it on their own computer to use at home. It can only be used at the space.
Cambam is also also pretty ok. It is probably worth $150 or however much it is. It can do all of the same gcode generation that vectric can (2d, 2.5d, and full 3d). Its interface looks like it came from the early 2000s, but I like it more because there is wwaaayy less of “oh, I need to make sure I am in x tab and I have run y tool so I can see the button to generate gcode” that vectric has. Like I said before, the 2d drawing tools aren’t as good as vectric and don’t have as much “pizazz”, but once you move beyond circles and squares whatever. The biggest downside of cambam is that it doesn’t have a gcode toolpath viewer (which basically lets you see how the gcode is going to cut something out), but I also generally a bad idea to check the output of a program in that same program. FWIW we already have 10 licenses that cambam gave when Julien asked over the summer.
I haven’t used Fusion 360, but looking at videos it is a full blown parametric CAD tool which has a way steeper learning curve, but it looks really freaking nice. I would stick to 2d and 2.5d tools like vectric and cambam for beginners.
I’ve used a handful of other tools that are open source, but they were all of the variety of “this is only worth the extra effort because it is free/open source” which I don’t want to impose on other people.
In short… if there is going to be a class on making anything past circles and squares, cambam and vectric are pretty much on par with capabilities. The difference is that basically no one is going to be able to afford buying vectric for their own use while you could with cambam, and paying $2k for vectric is a gigantic waste of money. There is no way in hell that it is worth that much.
Doing this vote is seriously jumping the gun. Only a handful of people have experience running the CNC with these tools and we have access to all three plus more at the space. Let’s let people try out different software during the classes first like Lorin said.
So, huge NO vote from me.
Jon